May 16, 2012 jazz6971 Says:
Don't like to drag this up from 5 months ago but dear oh dear have you missed the point. If you can't spot someone who is on your side then how on earth do you expect to win the war?
Non sentient cog of a self perpetuating regime. Keep yourself oiled. That way you can keep enforcing your opposition while the rest of us fight the intellectual fight for ourselves and on your behalf.
I sometimes wonder why I bother....I really do.
Peace and critical thinking fellows
Jan 11, 2012 aerofart Says:
Love British humor. Well done, gentlemen.
Jan 4, 2012 FreeSTOCKnolossROBOT Says:
very nice - I git FREE stock trading Bot if U like it is her...
Dec 9, 2011 ningram004 Says:
It's called satire my friend
Dec 4, 2011 Imasmashbro2 Says:
3:20 why does it have to be an unemployed BLACK man.....? Sublte.... Ignorant....
Dec 1, 2011 crazydudetz Says:
Saw this video in an Economics class in 2008. I never knew what the video was called and I wanted to find it again but couldn't. Searched "markets" today and found it by accident.
Cool.
Nov 26, 2011 GreatMcWhites Says:
If I loan someone $20, I have a right to payment of $20 in the future. If I need money now, and not later, I might sell that debt to someone at a discount, say, for $15. That person is then entitled to the $20 later, and gets a $5 profit IF the debt is paid. This is what buying debt is about, and why the buyer of debt gets screwed over if the underlying debtor can't pay his debts.
Nov 25, 2011 Fernando74959 Says:
This video was not good because they did not go into details about the true nature of fundamentals and sentiments.
Nov 20, 2011 Sirenhound Says:
buy waffles! tasty waffles! with lots of syrup!
Nov 11, 2011 12borekent Says:
Oh my God! How can people really believe that this is for real. Hello! this is satire and Bird and Fortune are actors and they are taking the piss out of the system. The clue is with the audience.............................they are laughing. OK.
Nov 8, 2011 MzSexyThang86 Says:
bad policies the gov said to banks hey you want to build a bank in this neighborhood? you have to lend money to a certain % of people in this area (Low income) the banks: these people don't quilfiy gov: well you cant build it banks can you insure us? Gov Sure! banks: no money down your job is your credit bad idea
Oct 31, 2011 MrBigEnchilada Says:
what dems and repubs fail to realize is that both regulation and de-regulation distort the market in some way, and usually these policies are proposed by corporations trying to appear to be concerned about something but actually trying to take up market share. It is very apparent that everyday people could care less about what sector to regulate or deregulate, the million dollar deals are made by big companies.
Oct 31, 2011 MrBigEnchilada Says:
However, many rich people also lost out on these, they bought huge, brand-new multimillion dollar homes to live, others bought multiple homes for investment thinking they can just sell it later. Some of these rich people killed themselves because they lost too much money from falling home prices, I know someone who lived in such a neighborhood.
The dems and some repubs had to covered up their mistakes by bailing out the banks, they couldnt let banks fail due to their policies.
Oct 31, 2011 MrBigEnchilada Says:
At first mortgage institutions made the stated income, verified assets (SIVA) loan policy. The big institutions started buying these loans and it became a quick buy (give out the loan) quick sell (sell the loan contract to banks) business so the risk was passed on. Thus out came the no income, verified assets (NIVA) loans. And at the peak of the loan sign No Income No Assets (NINA) came out.
Oct 31, 2011 LambChowder1 Says:
Uh no, democrats wanted availability of sub prime loans, not to gradually replace fixed rates with them. There are people who have subprime loans who are still in their homes, and there is no reason a subprime had to have balloon interest provisions hidden in them, or why they should have been given to people who qualified for better loans without telling them they did. How is a bailout a cover up? It was the most publically visible thing for years.
Oct 28, 2011 KinlanCommunications Says:
●/
/▌
// Reach the stars... Kinlan Communications ...´¯`•.¸¸★°•.☆.•°
Oct 18, 2011 arzoyan Says:
The Zeitgeist movement is the transcending of historically outdated obsolete,destructive,dehumanising political economy of PROFIT OF A FEW CRIMINAL RULING CLASS versus SANCTITY and HARMONY OF LIFE .The market system of artificial scarcity is the perpetuation of the servitude and the wage slavery of immrense humanity in a useless ,devaluing employment system. A democratic majority for a moneyless ,classless,statless communities of humnaity in cooperation,harmony and wisdo
Oct 16, 2011 MrBigEnchilada Says:
who thought it was smart to deregulate financial instruments? republicans
who thought it was smart to encourage banks to loan to those who couldnt
possibly pay ARM or mess with things like home equity loans? democrats
who thought it was smart to let fannie mac freddie mae to do whateverrr democrats
who had to cover up their dumb policies by quickly bailing out the banks? democrats
who went into government to make everything happen this way?
goldman sachs
Oct 15, 2011 demammoet Says:
Ha yeh that makes good sence.
I dont think that is the only factor in the equation though.
Think about Europe, we had one figure in Holland Malthus who really advocated birth control and education to lessen the suffering of families popping kids like its competitive sports.
He really made a difference. I believe that superstitions and emerging christianity are taking on very negative forms because people there do not know yet how to organize and be scientific.
adszicom: For Rent House in Phoenix Ready to Move IN! (2808 N 59th Lane Phoenix, AZ 85035): For Rent House in Phoenix Rea... http://t.co/LX3YVf05View Tweet
Post a comment
Local Comments (0)
Youtube Comments (215)
jazz6971 Says:
Don't like to drag this up from 5 months ago but dear oh dear have you missed the point. If you can't spot someone who is on your side then how on earth do you expect to win the war? Non sentient cog of a self perpetuating regime. Keep yourself oiled. That way you can keep enforcing your opposition while the rest of us fight the intellectual fight for ourselves and on your behalf. I sometimes wonder why I bother....I really do. Peace and critical thinking fellows
yogi07desai Says:
know about indian stock market - allstocksbse.blogspot.in
ECONOMYANDTRADING Says:
/watch?v=gFpb6yyZ43U community about economy and trading, beginner or expert.
kfoulias1 Says:
superb......
aerofart Says:
Love British humor. Well done, gentlemen.
FreeSTOCKnolossROBOT Says:
very nice - I git FREE stock trading Bot if U like it is her...
ningram004 Says:
It's called satire my friend
Imasmashbro2 Says:
3:20 why does it have to be an unemployed BLACK man.....? Sublte.... Ignorant....
crazydudetz Says:
Saw this video in an Economics class in 2008. I never knew what the video was called and I wanted to find it again but couldn't. Searched "markets" today and found it by accident. Cool.
SubzeroedMind Says:
What about it?
GreatMcWhites Says:
If I loan someone $20, I have a right to payment of $20 in the future. If I need money now, and not later, I might sell that debt to someone at a discount, say, for $15. That person is then entitled to the $20 later, and gets a $5 profit IF the debt is paid. This is what buying debt is about, and why the buyer of debt gets screwed over if the underlying debtor can't pay his debts.
Fernando74959 Says:
This video was not good because they did not go into details about the true nature of fundamentals and sentiments.
poppinpennystocks Says:
google poppin penny stocks
Sirenhound Says:
buy waffles! tasty waffles! with lots of syrup!
12borekent Says:
Oh my God! How can people really believe that this is for real. Hello! this is satire and Bird and Fortune are actors and they are taking the piss out of the system. The clue is with the audience.............................they are laughing. OK.
MzSexyThang86 Says:
bad policies the gov said to banks hey you want to build a bank in this neighborhood? you have to lend money to a certain % of people in this area (Low income) the banks: these people don't quilfiy gov: well you cant build it banks can you insure us? Gov Sure! banks: no money down your job is your credit bad idea
MrBigEnchilada Says:
what dems and repubs fail to realize is that both regulation and de-regulation distort the market in some way, and usually these policies are proposed by corporations trying to appear to be concerned about something but actually trying to take up market share. It is very apparent that everyday people could care less about what sector to regulate or deregulate, the million dollar deals are made by big companies.
MrBigEnchilada Says:
However, many rich people also lost out on these, they bought huge, brand-new multimillion dollar homes to live, others bought multiple homes for investment thinking they can just sell it later. Some of these rich people killed themselves because they lost too much money from falling home prices, I know someone who lived in such a neighborhood. The dems and some repubs had to covered up their mistakes by bailing out the banks, they couldnt let banks fail due to their policies.
MrBigEnchilada Says:
At first mortgage institutions made the stated income, verified assets (SIVA) loan policy. The big institutions started buying these loans and it became a quick buy (give out the loan) quick sell (sell the loan contract to banks) business so the risk was passed on. Thus out came the no income, verified assets (NIVA) loans. And at the peak of the loan sign No Income No Assets (NINA) came out.
LambChowder1 Says:
Uh no, democrats wanted availability of sub prime loans, not to gradually replace fixed rates with them. There are people who have subprime loans who are still in their homes, and there is no reason a subprime had to have balloon interest provisions hidden in them, or why they should have been given to people who qualified for better loans without telling them they did. How is a bailout a cover up? It was the most publically visible thing for years.
KinlanCommunications Says:
●/ /▌ // Reach the stars... Kinlan Communications ...´¯`•.¸¸★°•.☆.•°
sergiu9110 Says:
earn double money questbet.org earn double money questbet.org earn double money questbet.org earn double money questbet.org
arzoyan Says:
The Zeitgeist movement is the transcending of historically outdated obsolete,destructive,dehumanising political economy of PROFIT OF A FEW CRIMINAL RULING CLASS versus SANCTITY and HARMONY OF LIFE .The market system of artificial scarcity is the perpetuation of the servitude and the wage slavery of immrense humanity in a useless ,devaluing employment system. A democratic majority for a moneyless ,classless,statless communities of humnaity in cooperation,harmony and wisdo
MrBigEnchilada Says:
who thought it was smart to deregulate financial instruments? republicans who thought it was smart to encourage banks to loan to those who couldnt possibly pay ARM or mess with things like home equity loans? democrats who thought it was smart to let fannie mac freddie mae to do whateverrr democrats who had to cover up their dumb policies by quickly bailing out the banks? democrats who went into government to make everything happen this way? goldman sachs
demammoet Says:
Ha yeh that makes good sence. I dont think that is the only factor in the equation though. Think about Europe, we had one figure in Holland Malthus who really advocated birth control and education to lessen the suffering of families popping kids like its competitive sports. He really made a difference. I believe that superstitions and emerging christianity are taking on very negative forms because people there do not know yet how to organize and be scientific.